Contrur: Passive cone-shaped geometric structures

Description

The generator “Contur” is an experimental product developed for a technological and scientific exploration of the impact of geometric shapes on diverse biological, chemical, electronic and environmental systems. Examples of applications are:

  • diverse experiments with the shape effect
  • passive generation of weak non-EM emission based on the shape effect
  • exploring “the effect of pyramid”
  • structural amplifiers for long-range signal transmission on receiver or transmitor sides
  • experimental systems for exploring the imprinting effect with different modulating materials and feedback loops

The generator consists of cones inserted into each other on 0, 1/3 or 1/2 of their height (the focus position of 0%, 33% or 50%). Each cone is made from organic polymer coated by copper from both sides. Minimal thickness of each polymer/copper layer is 0.3 mm. Cones have a golden ratio in relation between the height and the base diameter.

The small size generator has 3 or 4 cones with 0% or 33% focus position, the middle size generator — 5 or 7 cones with 0% and 33% focus position. Change of the focus position can be performed by users.    

Delivery

  • Large copper-biopolymer cones, assembled or partially assembled (to reduce the risk of transpotration damages) in an acryl box
  • Small copper-biopolymer cone, assembled in the back part of the device
  • Small copper-biopolymer cone + metal cone for assembling in the front part (not assembled)
  • Description

Versions provided for eBay/Amazon/Etsy

 

  • a – 3 cones with the focus position 0%
  • b – 4 cones with the focus position 33%
  • c – 5 cones with the focus position 0%
  • d – 7 cones with the focus position 33%

We strongly reccomend to start experimentation with the version c!

Literature

 

  1. Cybertronica Research, The generator ‘Contur’. Innovation column, IJUS, 11(4), p.65, 2016
  2. S. Kernbach. Unconventional research in USSR and Russia: short overview. arXiv 1312.1148, 2013.
  3. S.N.Maslobrod, Distant impact of cone-shaped geometrical structures on bio-isometry of seedlings, International Journal of Unconventional Science, 11(4), pp. 54-57, 2016
  4. S.Kernbach, I.Kuksin, O.Kernbach, Analysis of weak emissions by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (rus), IJUS,  11(4), 6-22, 2016
  5. S.Kernbach, I.Kuksin, O.Kernbach On accurate differential measurements with electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, arxiv.org/abs/1607.07292, 2016
  6. S.Kernbach, The shape effect (rus), IJUS, 15-16(5), 63-82, 2017
  7. S. Kernbach, O. Kernbach, Impact of structural elements on high frequency non-contact conductometry (rus), IJUS, 12-13(4), 47-68, 2016
     
  8. I.R.Kumar, N.V.C.Swamy, and H.R.Nagendra. Effect of pyramids on microorganisms. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 4(4):373-379, 2005
  9. S.V. Mjkin, I.V. Vasilieva, and A.V. Rudenko. Investigation of the influence of the field generated by a pyramid on the material objects (rus). Consciousness and physical reality, (7(2)):45–53, 2002.
  10. V. Uvarov. Horus’ Rod. Application N 22,23,25,26,28,29 — Results of physical and biological experiments (rus). Nevskij Kurier, 2005
  11. U.N. Cherednichenko and L.P. Michailova. The shape effect and phase transition: experimental investigation of distant interaction on physical sensors and cellular bio-indicators (rus). Parapsychology and psychophysics, (2):67–73, 1999